Bahrain vs Bolivia, Plurinational State of: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Bahrain
44.48
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
43.96
in 2019
Bahrain rank
66th
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
69th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Bahrain
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 44.48 against 43.96 in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, a difference of 0.52.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Bahrain has been ahead every year.
Bahrain ranks 66th and Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 69th of 190 countries.
Bahrain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.89 | 40.66 | 1.23 | Bahrain |
| 2010s | 44.48 | 42.89 | 1.59 | Bahrain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Bahrain or Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Bahrain, at 44.48 against 43.96 in Bolivia, Plurinational State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Bahrain and Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- 0.52, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Bahrain and Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Bahrain ranks 66th and Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 69th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.