Azerbaijan vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Azerbaijan
42.71
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
42.58
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
76th
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
78th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Azerbaijan
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 42.71 against 42.58 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0.13.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 76th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 78th of 191 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.45 | 36.63 | 4.83 | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 42.24 | 39.85 | 2.39 | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Azerbaijan or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Azerbaijan, at 42.71 against 42.58 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Azerbaijan and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0.13, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Azerbaijan ranks 76th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 78th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.