Austria vs Chinese Taipei: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Austria
86.03
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
88.5
in 2019
Austria rank
19th
Chinese Taipei rank
16th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Austria
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Chinese Taipei currently reports 88.5 against 86.03 in Austria, a difference of 2.47.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.
Austria ranks 19th and Chinese Taipei ranks 16th of 190 countries.
Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.11 | 86.83 | 8.72 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 86.07 | 88.29 | 2.23 | Chinese Taipei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Austria or Chinese Taipei?
- Chinese Taipei, at 88.5 against 86.03 in Austria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Austria and Chinese Taipei?
- 2.47, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Chinese Taipei?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Chinese Taipei rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Austria ranks 19th and Chinese Taipei ranks 16th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.