Australia vs Taiwan, China: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Australia
88.97
in 2019
Taiwan, China
88.5
in 2019
Australia rank
15th
Taiwan, China rank
16th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Australia
- Taiwan, China
How they compare
Australia currently reports 88.97 against 88.5 in Taiwan, China, a difference of 0.47.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Taiwan, China ahead.
Australia ranks 15th and Taiwan, China ranks 16th of 190 countries.
Taiwan, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Taiwan, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.67 | 86.83 | 1.17 | Taiwan, China |
| 2010s | 88.16 | 88.29 | 0.1339 | Taiwan, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Australia or Taiwan, China?
- Australia, at 88.97 against 88.5 in Taiwan, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Australia and Taiwan, China?
- 0.47, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Taiwan, China?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Taiwan, China rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Australia ranks 15th and Taiwan, China ranks 16th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.