Argentina vs Congo, Republic of: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Argentina
20.69
in 2019
Congo, Republic of
20.84
in 2019
Argentina rank
143rd
Congo, Republic of rank
141st
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Argentina
- Congo, Republic of
How they compare
Congo, Republic of currently reports 20.84 against 20.69 in Argentina, a difference of 0.15.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 143rd and Congo, Republic of ranks 141st of 190 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Congo, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.58 | 18.39 | 14.2 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 28.34 | 19.45 | 8.89 | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Argentina or Congo, Republic of?
- Congo, Republic of, at 20.84 against 20.69 in Argentina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Argentina and Congo, Republic of?
- 0.15, with Congo, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Congo, Republic of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Congo, Republic of rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Argentina ranks 143rd and Congo, Republic of ranks 141st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.