Antigua and Barbuda vs Seychelles: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
39.92
in 2019
Seychelles
41.82
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
85th
Seychelles rank
82nd
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 41.82 against 39.92 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 1.9.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Seychelles has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 85th and Seychelles ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.17 | 43.01 | 5.84 | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 38.9 | 41.87 | 2.97 | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 41.82 against 39.92 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Seychelles?
- 1.9, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Seychelles?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Seychelles rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 85th and Seychelles ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.