Antigua and Barbuda vs China: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
39.92
in 2019
China
39.77
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
85th
China rank
86th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- China
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 39.92 against 39.77 in China, a difference of 0.15.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 85th and China ranks 86th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.17 | 36.49 | 0.679 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 38.9 | 39.2 | 0.3032 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or China?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 39.92 against 39.77 in China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and China?
- 0.15, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and China?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and China rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 85th and China ranks 86th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.