Afghanistan vs Solomon Islands: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Afghanistan
28.74
in 2019
Solomon Islands
26.24
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
125th
Solomon Islands rank
128th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Afghanistan
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 28.74 against 26.24 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 2.5.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 125th and Solomon Islands ranks 128th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.23 | 25.17 | 11.93 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 28.46 | 26.02 | 2.44 | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Afghanistan or Solomon Islands?
- Afghanistan, at 28.74 against 26.24 in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Afghanistan and Solomon Islands?
- 2.5, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Solomon Islands?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Solomon Islands rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Afghanistan ranks 125th and Solomon Islands ranks 128th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.