Afghanistan vs Papua New Guinea: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Afghanistan
28.74
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
26.82
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
125th
Papua New Guinea rank
127th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Afghanistan
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 28.74 against 26.82 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1.92.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 125th and Papua New Guinea ranks 127th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.23 | 25.32 | 12.08 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 28.46 | 26.15 | 2.31 | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Afghanistan or Papua New Guinea?
- Afghanistan, at 28.74 against 26.82 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Afghanistan and Papua New Guinea?
- 1.92, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Papua New Guinea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Afghanistan ranks 125th and Papua New Guinea ranks 127th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.