Spain vs United States of America: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6)
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) over time
- Spain
- United States of America
How they compare
Spain currently reports 6 DB15-20 methodology against 6 DB15-20 methodology in United States of America, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Spain ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 1st of 191 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.86 DB15-20 methodology | 6 DB15-20 methodology | 1.14 DB15-20 methodology | United States of America |
| 2010s | 6 DB15-20 methodology | 6 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6), Spain or United States of America?
- Spain, at 6 DB15-20 methodology against 6 DB15-20 methodology in United States of America as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) between Spain and United States of America?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and United States of America?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Spain and United States of America rank globally for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
- Spain ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unsecured creditors during distribution of assets.