South Sudan vs Taiwan: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
South Sudan
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Taiwan
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
South Sudan rank
52nd
Taiwan rank
52nd
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- South Sudan
- Taiwan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Taiwan, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Taiwan has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 52nd and Taiwan ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Taiwan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Taiwan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | Taiwan |
| 2010s | 2.4 DB15-20 methodology | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.1 DB15-20 methodology | Taiwan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), South Sudan or Taiwan?
- South Sudan, at 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Taiwan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between South Sudan and Taiwan?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Taiwan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do South Sudan and Taiwan rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- South Sudan ranks 52nd and Taiwan ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.