South Africa vs Sweden: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
South Africa
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Sweden
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
South Africa rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- South Africa
- Sweden
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Sweden, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), South Africa or Sweden?
- South Africa, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between South Africa and Sweden?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sweden?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do South Africa and Sweden rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- South Africa ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.