Saudi Arabia vs Zambia: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Saudi Arabia
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Zambia
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Saudi Arabia rank
1st
Zambia rank
1st
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Zambia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Zambia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Saudi Arabia ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 2.1 DB15-20 methodology | 2.1 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Saudi Arabia or Zambia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Saudi Arabia and Zambia?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Zambia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Zambia rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.