Samoa vs Uzbekistan: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Samoa
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Uzbekistan
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Samoa rank
52nd
Uzbekistan rank
52nd
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Samoa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Samoa ranks 52nd and Uzbekistan ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.07 DB15-20 methodology | 2.43 DB15-20 methodology | 0.3571 DB15-20 methodology | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Samoa or Uzbekistan?
- Samoa, at 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Samoa and Uzbekistan?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Uzbekistan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Samoa and Uzbekistan rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Samoa ranks 52nd and Uzbekistan ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.