Samoa vs Suriname: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Samoa
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Suriname
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Samoa rank
52nd
Suriname rank
52nd
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Samoa
- Suriname
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Suriname, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Samoa ranks 52nd and Suriname ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.07 DB15-20 methodology | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.4286 DB15-20 methodology | Suriname |
| 2010s | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Samoa or Suriname?
- Samoa, at 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Samoa and Suriname?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Suriname?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Samoa and Suriname rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Samoa ranks 52nd and Suriname ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.