Samoa vs Slovenia: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Samoa
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Slovenia
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Samoa rank
52nd
Slovenia rank
52nd
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Samoa
- Slovenia
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Slovenia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Samoa ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.07 DB15-20 methodology | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.4286 DB15-20 methodology | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Samoa or Slovenia?
- Samoa, at 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Slovenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Samoa and Slovenia?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Slovenia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Samoa and Slovenia rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Samoa ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.