Panama vs Thailand: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Panama
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Thailand
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Panama rank
52nd
Thailand rank
52nd
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Panama
- Thailand
How they compare
Panama currently reports 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Thailand, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 52nd and Thailand ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 2.15 DB15-20 methodology | 2.2 DB15-20 methodology | 0.05 DB15-20 methodology | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Panama or Thailand?
- Panama, at 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Panama and Thailand?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Thailand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Panama and Thailand rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Panama ranks 52nd and Thailand ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.