New Zealand vs Spain: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
New Zealand
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Spain
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand rank
1st
Spain rank
1st
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- New Zealand
- Spain
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Spain, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.29 DB15-20 methodology | 2.71 DB15-20 methodology | 0.4286 DB15-20 methodology | Spain |
| 2010s | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), New Zealand or Spain?
- New Zealand, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Spain as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between New Zealand and Spain?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Spain?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Spain rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- New Zealand ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.