Namibia vs Zambia: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Namibia
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Zambia
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Namibia rank
1st
Zambia rank
1st
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Namibia
- Zambia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Zambia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | Namibia |
| 2010s | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 2.1 DB15-20 methodology | 0.9 DB15-20 methodology | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Namibia or Zambia?
- Namibia, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Namibia and Zambia?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zambia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and Zambia rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Namibia ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.