Mauritius vs Namibia: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Mauritius
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Namibia
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Mauritius rank
1st
Namibia rank
1st
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Namibia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 1st and Namibia ranks 1st of 190 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.14 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 0.8571 DB15-20 methodology | Namibia |
| 2010s | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Mauritius or Namibia?
- Mauritius, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Mauritius ranks 1st and Namibia ranks 1st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.