Malawi vs Tanzania: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Malawi
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Tanzania
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Malawi rank
1st
Tanzania rank
1st
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Malawi
- Tanzania
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Tanzania, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2.57 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5714 DB15-20 methodology | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 2.3 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 0.7 DB15-20 methodology | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Malawi or Tanzania?
- Malawi, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Tanzania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Malawi and Tanzania?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tanzania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and Tanzania rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Malawi ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.