Kenya vs Mauritius: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Kenya
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Mauritius
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Kenya rank
1st
Mauritius rank
1st
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Kenya
- Mauritius
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Mauritius, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2.14 DB15-20 methodology | 0.1429 DB15-20 methodology | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 2.4 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 0.6 DB15-20 methodology | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Kenya or Mauritius?
- Kenya, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Kenya and Mauritius?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Mauritius?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kenya and Mauritius rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Kenya ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.