Jordan vs Latvia: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Jordan
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Latvia
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Jordan rank
52nd
Latvia rank
52nd
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Jordan
- Latvia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Latvia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 52nd and Latvia ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2.14 DB15-20 methodology | 0.1429 DB15-20 methodology | Latvia |
| 2010s | 2.05 DB15-20 methodology | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.45 DB15-20 methodology | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Jordan or Latvia?
- Jordan, at 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Jordan and Latvia?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Latvia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Latvia rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Jordan ranks 52nd and Latvia ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.