Georgia vs South Sudan: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)

Georgia
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
South Sudan
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Georgia rank
52nd
South Sudan rank
52nd

Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time

  • Georgia
  • South Sudan
00.511.522.5200320112019

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in South Sudan, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 52nd and South Sudan ranks 52nd of 191 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 2.21 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 0.2143 DB15-20 methodology Georgia
2010s 1.8 DB15-20 methodology 2.4 DB15-20 methodology 0.6 DB15-20 methodology South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Georgia or South Sudan?
Georgia, at 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in South Sudan as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Georgia and South Sudan?
0 DB15-20 methodology, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Sudan?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Georgia and South Sudan rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
Georgia ranks 52nd and South Sudan ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs South Sudan: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3). Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/resolving-insolvency-commencement-of-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/georgia/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/resolving-insolvency-commencement-of-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/georgia/south-sudan/">Georgia vs South Sudan: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,247 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commence­ment of insolvency proceedings.