Georgia vs Samoa: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Georgia
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Samoa
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Georgia rank
52nd
Samoa rank
52nd
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Georgia
- Samoa
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Samoa, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 52nd and Samoa ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.21 DB15-20 methodology | 2.07 DB15-20 methodology | 0.1429 DB15-20 methodology | Georgia |
| 2010s | 1.8 DB15-20 methodology | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.7 DB15-20 methodology | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Georgia or Samoa?
- Georgia, at 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Georgia and Samoa?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Samoa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Georgia and Samoa rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Georgia ranks 52nd and Samoa ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.