Eritrea vs Hong Kong, China: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Eritrea
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong, China
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Eritrea rank
117th
Hong Kong, China rank
117th
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Eritrea
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 117th and Hong Kong, China ranks 117th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Eritrea or Hong Kong, China?
- Eritrea, at 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Eritrea and Hong Kong, China?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Hong Kong, China?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Eritrea and Hong Kong, China rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Eritrea ranks 117th and Hong Kong, China ranks 117th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.