Egypt vs South Sudan: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Egypt
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
South Sudan
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Egypt rank
52nd
South Sudan rank
52nd
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Egypt
- South Sudan
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in South Sudan, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 52nd and South Sudan ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 2.1 DB15-20 methodology | 2.4 DB15-20 methodology | 0.3 DB15-20 methodology | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Egypt or South Sudan?
- Egypt, at 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Egypt and South Sudan?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and South Sudan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Egypt and South Sudan rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Egypt ranks 52nd and South Sudan ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.