Egypt vs Grenada: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Egypt
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Grenada
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Egypt rank
52nd
Grenada rank
52nd
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Egypt
- Grenada
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Grenada, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 52nd and Grenada ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 2.1 DB15-20 methodology | 2.15 DB15-20 methodology | 0.05 DB15-20 methodology | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Egypt or Grenada?
- Egypt, at 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Grenada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Egypt and Grenada?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Grenada?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Egypt and Grenada rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Egypt ranks 52nd and Grenada ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.