Ecuador vs Myanmar: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Ecuador
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Myanmar
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Ecuador rank
117th
Myanmar rank
117th
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Ecuador
- Myanmar
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Myanmar, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 117th and Myanmar ranks 117th of 191 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.5 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 1.75 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0.25 DB15-20 methodology | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Ecuador or Myanmar?
- Ecuador, at 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Myanmar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Ecuador and Myanmar?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Myanmar?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Myanmar rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Ecuador ranks 117th and Myanmar ranks 117th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.