Denmark vs Sweden: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Denmark
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Sweden
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Denmark rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Denmark
- Sweden
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Sweden, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | Sweden |
| 2010s | 2.9 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 0.1 DB15-20 methodology | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Denmark or Sweden?
- Denmark, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Denmark and Sweden?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Sweden?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and Sweden rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Denmark ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.