Denmark vs Spain: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Denmark
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Spain
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Denmark rank
1st
Spain rank
1st
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Denmark
- Spain
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Spain, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 190 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2.71 DB15-20 methodology | 0.7143 DB15-20 methodology | Spain |
| 2010s | 2.9 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 0.1 DB15-20 methodology | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Denmark or Spain?
- Denmark, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Spain as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Denmark and Spain?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Spain?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and Spain rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Denmark ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.