Cyprus vs Denmark: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Cyprus
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Denmark
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Cyprus rank
1st
Denmark rank
1st
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Cyprus
- Denmark
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Denmark, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 1st and Denmark ranks 1st of 190 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 2.9 DB15-20 methodology | 0.4 DB15-20 methodology | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Cyprus or Denmark?
- Cyprus, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Denmark as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Cyprus and Denmark?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Denmark?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Cyprus and Denmark rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Cyprus ranks 1st and Denmark ranks 1st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.