China vs Croatia: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
China
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Croatia
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
China rank
1st
Croatia rank
1st
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- China
- Croatia
How they compare
China currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Croatia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Croatia ahead.
China ranks 1st and Croatia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.29 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 0.7143 DB15-20 methodology | Croatia |
| 2010s | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 2.85 DB15-20 methodology | 0.15 DB15-20 methodology | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), China or Croatia?
- China, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Croatia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between China and Croatia?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Croatia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do China and Croatia rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- China ranks 1st and Croatia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.