China vs Costa Rica: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
China
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Costa Rica
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
China rank
1st
Costa Rica rank
1st
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- China
- Costa Rica
How they compare
China currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
China ranks 1st and Costa Rica ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.29 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 0.7143 DB15-20 methodology | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), China or Costa Rica?
- China, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Costa Rica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between China and Costa Rica?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Costa Rica?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do China and Costa Rica rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- China ranks 1st and Costa Rica ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.