Brazil vs Hungary: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Brazil
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Hungary
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Brazil rank
52nd
Hungary rank
52nd
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Brazil
- Hungary
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Hungary, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 52nd and Hungary ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.29 DB15-20 methodology | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.2143 DB15-20 methodology | Hungary |
| 2010s | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Brazil or Hungary?
- Brazil, at 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Hungary as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Brazil and Hungary?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Hungary?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Hungary rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Brazil ranks 52nd and Hungary ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.