Bahrain vs Estonia: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Bahrain
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Estonia
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Bahrain rank
52nd
Estonia rank
52nd
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Bahrain
- Estonia
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Estonia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Bahrain ranks 52nd and Estonia ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2.07 DB15-20 methodology | 0.0714 DB15-20 methodology | Estonia |
| 2010s | 2.05 DB15-20 methodology | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.45 DB15-20 methodology | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Bahrain or Estonia?
- Bahrain, at 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Estonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Bahrain and Estonia?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Estonia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bahrain and Estonia rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Bahrain ranks 52nd and Estonia ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.