Bahrain vs Czechia: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Bahrain
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Czechia
2.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Bahrain rank
52nd
Czechia rank
52nd
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Bahrain
- Czechia
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Czechia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Bahrain ranks 52nd and Czechia ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | Czechia |
| 2010s | 2.05 DB15-20 methodology | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.45 DB15-20 methodology | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Bahrain or Czechia?
- Bahrain, at 2.5 DB15-20 methodology against 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in Czechia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Bahrain and Czechia?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Czechia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bahrain and Czechia rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Bahrain ranks 52nd and Czechia ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.