Ireland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)
Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) over time
- Ireland
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.3% against 0.2% in Ireland, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.5 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Ireland ranks 139th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 136th of 156 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.2% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2000s | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), Ireland or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.3% against 0.2% in Ireland as of 2009.
- What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Ireland and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.1%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2009.
- How do Ireland and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)?
- Ireland ranks 139th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 136th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in a given school year, expressed as a percentage of male enrolment in lower secondary education in the previous school year. Divide the number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in school year t+1 by the number of male pupils from the same cohort enrolled in lower secondary education in the previous school year t.