Hong Kong, China vs Timor-Leste: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)
Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 4.1% against 4.0% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 61st and Timor-Leste ranks 60th of 156 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.9% | 3.0% | 0.9% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 4.2% | 3.9% | 0.4% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), Hong Kong, China or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 4.1% against 4.0% in Hong Kong, China as of 2018.
- What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Hong Kong, China and Timor-Leste?
- 0.1%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Timor-Leste?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Timor-Leste rank globally for repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 61st and Timor-Leste ranks 60th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in a given school year, expressed as a percentage of male enrolment in lower secondary education in the previous school year. Divide the number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in school year t+1 by the number of male pupils from the same cohort enrolled in lower secondary education in the previous school year t.