Gambia vs Hong Kong, China: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)
Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) over time
- Gambia
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 4.0% against 3.8% in Gambia, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Gambia ranks 63rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 61st of 156 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.3% | 3.3% | 0.1% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 3.3% | 4.1% | 0.8% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), Gambia or Hong Kong, China?
- Hong Kong, China, at 4.0% against 3.8% in Gambia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Gambia and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.2%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Hong Kong, China?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Gambia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)?
- Gambia ranks 63rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 61st of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in a given school year, expressed as a percentage of male enrolment in lower secondary education in the previous school year. Divide the number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in school year t+1 by the number of male pupils from the same cohort enrolled in lower secondary education in the previous school year t.