Cambodia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)
Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) over time
- Cambodia
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 3.6% against 3.5% in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
Cambodia ranks 64th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 65th of 156 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.9% | 1.5% | 3.4% | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 2.4% | 3.5% | 1.1% | Turks and Caicos Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), Cambodia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Cambodia, at 3.6% against 3.5% in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2018.
- What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Cambodia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0.1%, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2014.
- How do Cambodia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)?
- Cambodia ranks 64th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 65th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in a given school year, expressed as a percentage of male enrolment in lower secondary education in the previous school year. Divide the number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in school year t+1 by the number of male pupils from the same cohort enrolled in lower secondary education in the previous school year t.