Cambodia vs Hong Kong, China: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)
Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) over time
- Cambodia
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 4.0% against 3.6% in Cambodia, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 64th and Hong Kong, China ranks 61st of 156 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.5% | 3.2% | 1.3% | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 2.9% | 4.2% | 1.3% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), Cambodia or Hong Kong, China?
- Hong Kong, China, at 4.0% against 3.6% in Cambodia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Cambodia and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.4%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Hong Kong, China?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Cambodia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)?
- Cambodia ranks 64th and Hong Kong, China ranks 61st of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in a given school year, expressed as a percentage of male enrolment in lower secondary education in the previous school year. Divide the number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in school year t+1 by the number of male pupils from the same cohort enrolled in lower secondary education in the previous school year t.