Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Finland: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)
Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Finland
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.4% against 0.4% in Finland, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Finland ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 127th and Finland ranks 129th of 156 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.1% | Finland |
| 2010s | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Finland?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.4% against 0.4% in Finland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Finland?
- 0.0%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Finland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Finland rank globally for repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 127th and Finland ranks 129th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in a given school year, expressed as a percentage of male enrolment in lower secondary education in the previous school year. Divide the number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in school year t+1 by the number of male pupils from the same cohort enrolled in lower secondary education in the previous school year t.