Bangladesh vs Cuba: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)
Bangladesh
2.1%
in 2015
Cuba
2.1%
in 2018
Bangladesh rank
86th
Cuba rank
87th
Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) over time
- Bangladesh
- Cuba
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 2.1% against 2.1% in Cuba, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 86th and Cuba ranks 87th of 156 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.7% | 2.0% | 1.7% | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 5.2% | 1.1% | 4.1% | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 2.1% | 2.1% | 0.0% | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), Bangladesh or Cuba?
- Bangladesh, at 2.1% against 2.1% in Cuba as of 2015.
- What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Bangladesh and Cuba?
- 0.0%, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Cuba?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2015.
- How do Bangladesh and Cuba rank globally for repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)?
- Bangladesh ranks 86th and Cuba ranks 87th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in a given school year, expressed as a percentage of male enrolment in lower secondary education in the previous school year. Divide the number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in school year t+1 by the number of male pupils from the same cohort enrolled in lower secondary education in the previous school year t.