What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Tanzania, United Republic of and Turks and Caicos Islands?

0.1%, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Turks and Caicos Islands?

5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2008.

Where does this data come from?

UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)

Tanzania, United Republic of

1.7%

in 2017

Turks and Caicos Islands

1.8%

in 2014

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

75th

Turks and Caicos Islands rank

73rd

Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) over time

Tanzania, United Republic of
Turks and Caicos Islands

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 1.8% against 1.7% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.1%.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 75th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 73rd of 156 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), Tanzania, United Republic of or Turks and Caicos Islands?: Turks and Caicos Islands, at 1.8% against 1.7% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2014.
What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Tanzania, United Republic of and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 0.1%, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2008.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)?: Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 75th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 73rd of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/repetition-rate-in-lower-secondary-general-education-all-grades-female-percent/tanzania/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/repetition-rate-in-lower-secondary-general-education-all-grades-female-percent/tanzania/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), female (%)
Unit: %
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 156 places, 1,984 data points, 1970–2019
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Number of female repeaters in lower secondary education in a given school year, expressed as a percentage of female enrolment in lower secondary education in the previous school year. Divide the number of female repeaters in lower secondary education in school year t+1 by the number of female pupils from the same cohort enrolled in lower secondary education in the previous school year t.