Jordan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)
Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) over time
- Jordan
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 2.1% against 2.1% in Jordan, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Jordan ranks 69th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 68th of 156 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.9% | 1.9% | 0.0% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 1.8% | 2.1% | 0.3% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), Jordan or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 2.1% against 2.1% in Jordan as of 2015.
- What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Jordan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.0%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2013.
- How do Jordan and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)?
- Jordan ranks 69th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 68th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of female repeaters in lower secondary education in a given school year, expressed as a percentage of female enrolment in lower secondary education in the previous school year. Divide the number of female repeaters in lower secondary education in school year t+1 by the number of female pupils from the same cohort enrolled in lower secondary education in the previous school year t.