Brunei Darussalam vs Luxembourg: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)
Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 1.1% against 0.9% in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Brunei Darussalam's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 90th and Luxembourg ranks 93rd of 156 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.8% | 10.1% | 5.3% | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 1.0% | 8.3% | 7.3% | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), Brunei Darussalam or Luxembourg?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 1.1% against 0.9% in Luxembourg as of 2018.
- What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Brunei Darussalam and Luxembourg?
- 0.2%, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Luxembourg?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2017.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Luxembourg rank globally for repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 90th and Luxembourg ranks 93rd of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of female repeaters in lower secondary education in a given school year, expressed as a percentage of female enrolment in lower secondary education in the previous school year. Divide the number of female repeaters in lower secondary education in school year t+1 by the number of female pupils from the same cohort enrolled in lower secondary education in the previous school year t.