Solomon Islands vs Viet Nam: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)
Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) over time
- Solomon Islands
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 0.9% against 0.8% in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Solomon Islands ranks 115th and Viet Nam ranks 118th of 156 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Solomon Islands averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 2.1% | 2.1% | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.5% | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.0% | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), Solomon Islands or Viet Nam?
- Solomon Islands, at 0.9% against 0.8% in Viet Nam as of 2017.
- What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Solomon Islands and Viet Nam?
- 0.1%, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2017.
- How do Solomon Islands and Viet Nam rank globally for repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)?
- Solomon Islands ranks 115th and Viet Nam ranks 118th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of repeaters in lower secondary education in a given school year, expressed as a percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in the previous school year. Divide the number of repeaters in lower secondary education in school year t+1 by the number of pupils from the same cohort enrolled in lower secondary education in the previous school year t.