Serbia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, total
Serbia
59.46 billion current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
62.99 billion current US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
79th
Zimbabwe rank
76th
Renewable natural capital, total over time
- Serbia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 62.99 billion current US$ against 59.46 billion current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 3.52 billion current US$.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 79th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 150 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.03 billion current US$ | 63.72 billion current US$ | 14.69 billion current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 53.00 billion current US$ | 74.71 billion current US$ | 21.71 billion current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 59.46 billion current US$ | 62.99 billion current US$ | 3.52 billion current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, total, Serbia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 62.99 billion current US$ against 59.46 billion current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, total between Serbia and Zimbabwe?
- 3.52 billion current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Serbia and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, total?
- Serbia ranks 79th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.