Malawi vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital, total
Malawi
131.22 billion current US$
in 2020
Zambia
135.64 billion current US$
in 2020
Malawi rank
54th
Zambia rank
51st
Renewable natural capital, total over time
- Malawi
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 135.64 billion current US$ against 131.22 billion current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 4.42 billion current US$.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.
Malawi ranks 54th and Zambia ranks 51st of 150 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.55 billion current US$ | 37.21 billion current US$ | 11.66 billion current US$ | Zambia |
| 2000s | 58.19 billion current US$ | 61.70 billion current US$ | 3.51 billion current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 131.74 billion current US$ | 134.04 billion current US$ | 2.31 billion current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 131.22 billion current US$ | 135.64 billion current US$ | 4.42 billion current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, total, Malawi or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 135.64 billion current US$ against 131.22 billion current US$ in Malawi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, total between Malawi and Zambia?
- 4.42 billion current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Malawi and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital, total?
- Malawi ranks 54th and Zambia ranks 51st of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.